|
Nodilittorina pyramidalis: The Pyramid Periwinkle (Quoy and Gaimard, 1833)
|
|
Melita Jayne Gaston 2018
|
|
|
Summary | |
Nodilittorina pyramidalis (N.
pyramidalis; Quoy and Gaimard, 1833), commonly known as the pyramid periwinkle is a small snail
found in the high intertidal zone above the mean high tide (supralittoral zone)
along the east coast of Australia (Reid and Williams, 2004). The species ranges in size from a few millimetres
to a few centimetres and its characteristic shell is blue-purple to grey in colour
and is covered in white nodules (Reid and Williams, 2004). This snail appears to prefer substrates that
are more complex (interesting texture and crevices) and a small study has been
conducted to determine how the periwinkle’s position on the rock changes in
relation to the distance from the water (Chapman and Underwood, 1994). I found that as distance from the
water increases, the periwinkles prefer more mild environments, mostly to reduce
thermal and desiccation (drying) stresses. The behaviour of this species also tends
to revolve around reducing thermal and desiccation stresses with individuals forming
moist aggregations as well as removing their foot from the substrate to reduce the
amount of heat entering the body (Lim, 2008).
The pyramid periwinkle
feeds on microalgae using its long rasping radula, one of the main features of
the body along with dark coloured head and cephalic tentacles (Reid and Williams, 2004). There are several
important internal systems required for the functioning of this species including
the circulatory, respiratory, digestive, excretory and sensory systems discussed
further in this webpage (Brusca, et al. 2016). Sexes are separate in N. pyramidalis and there is internal fertilisation via the penes
and pallial duct (Underwood, 1974). There is a long-lived larval stage in this species allowing
for large dispersal prior to settling and metamorphosing into the juvenile
condition (Underwood, 1974). The pyramid periwinkle is not directly under threat at this stage
due to its high thermal tolerance and dispersal capabilities, however it may be
at risk soon with the changing climate.
This species belongs to the
family Littorinidae (littorinids) which includes all the periwinkle snails,
however this taxonomy within this group is still under dispute. Currently, the
genus Nodilittorina is considered
monotypic, meaning there is only one species in the genus which is Nodilittorina pyramidalis (Reid and Williams, 2004).
Names used for Nodilittorina pyramidalis
in this webpage: Nodilittorina pyramidalis,
N. pyramidalis, pyramid periwinkle
and it is also referred to within the broad groups of Littorinimorpha, Littorinidae
and littorinids.
|
|
|
Physical Description | |
Nodilittorina pyramidalis (Quoy and Gaimard, 1833) is a large
periwinkle from the family Littorinidae. The snails are easily recognisable and
are common along the rocky shores of eastern Australia (Figure 2,3). The shells are commonly
purple-blue to grey and have rows of white nodules following the whorls which are not axially aligned (Reid, 2002). The shells have two rows of
nodules on the last whorl (penultimate) and there are no nodules on the base of the shell.
The shell is typically tall-spired and turbinate in shape, however this can
vary depending on the environmental conditions (Reid, 2002). Mature individuals range in shell
heights from a few mm up to approximately three centimetres. The aperture is
flared in shape and is brown with two cream bands on the outer edge (Reid, 2002).
|
|
|
Ecology |
General Habitat and Feeding | |
The pyramid periwinkle is primarily found on intertidal rocky coastlines in the high
shore area, frequently above the height of the highest spring tide (supra-littoral zone, Figure 4) (Berry, 1986;
Chapman and Underwood, 1994). The supra-littoral zone is typically very variable throughout space and time due to the variable tides and
weather, causing these areas to be thought of as harsh and
unpredictable (Chapman 2000a). N. pyramidalis
may be exposed for days at a time in this habitat, however this species
still relies on moisture or seawater to feed, move and reproduce (Chapman 2000a).
Figure 4: A section of the intertidal zone at Moffat Beach, Queensland (4551) as the tide is rising. The red line indicates the high intertidal zone in this section.
This supra-littoral species feeds on microalgae on rocks in these high shore
areas using its radula (Figure 5). Due to the potential for desiccation, N. pyramidalis only feeds when the
substrate is wet. Therefore, foraging in these high zones are not necessarily
driven by tidal influences, but potentially larger scale patterns pertaining to
moisture (Little, 1989). Pyramid periwinkles also display intraspecific and interspecific aggregational behaviours in response to the environment, and these have been discussed in the behavioural section.
|
|
|
Preferential Habitat | |
When I collected specimens of N. pyramidalis from the rocky shore at Moffat Beach (QLD, 4551), I
noticed the species appeared to prefer particular substrate types (Figure 6).
This observation was similar to Chapman and Underwood’s hypothesis (1994) which
found that pyramid periwinkles tend to
avoid smooth rocks and simple topographical areas contrary to Austrolittorina unifasciata. In this
investigation, the individuals that were translocated to smooth or uncomplex topographical
areas quickly migrated to new areas, actively avoiding simples surfaces. Complex topography was not enough to retain individuals in a
particular area for an extended period of time and it is likely the food
availability is also important to the distribution of the species throughout
the intertidal zone (Chapman and Underwood, 1994). I also observed that N. pyramidalis tended to either be on
the most exposed surface to the ocean or in crevices within the rock. Again, this
observation is similar to an observation posed by Chapman and Underwood (1994).
Pits and crevices however had no correlation with distribution of pyramid periwinkles in their investigation, however
it is possible that although crevices themselves may not greatly influence distribution, conditions created within the crevice environments are more preferable. For instance, microalgae may have a higher abundance within crevices or temperature and moisture may be more preferable in crevice microenvironments.
|
|
|
Preferential Habitat Investigation | |
Hypotheses:
I noticed that the positioning of individuals on the
substrate appeared to differ depending on their distance from the low tide
water mark at Moffat Beach (QLD, 4551). I hypothesized the proportion of N. pyramidalis in milder environments
will increase as the distance from water increases due to increasing need to be
nearer the ocean to prevent desiccation, feed and reproduce. Similarly, the
proportion of pyramid periwinkles in harsh
micro-environments will decrease as you move further from shore. Hence, I
conducted a small experiment to determine the distribution of N. pyramidalis throughout micro-habitats on rocky shores.
Methods:
I randomly selected three approximately fifty metre
transects of Moffat Beach from the low tide water mark to where the rocks ended
at the hill face. The closest rock to the transect which had N. pyramidalis present was selected
every metre. The individuals on each rock
surface were counted (as well as the total) and placed into a harsh or mild
micro-environment category. Harsh micro-environments consisted of individuals
that were either on the top of the substrate or on the landward facing
substrate surface. Mild micro-environments consisted of individuals on either
the side of the substrate or on the shore-ward facing substrate surface. The
proportion of individuals in harsh or mild environments were calculated
compared.
Results:
Abundance in general increases from around 40m to about 46m
from the low tide mark then decreases as distance increases (Figure 8). There
is also a clear increase in the proportion of individuals in milder
microhabitats as the distance from the low tide mark increases (R2 =
0.77, Figure 9). Similarly, the proportion of individuals in harsher
microhabitats decreases as the distance increases (R2 = 0.77, Figure 9).
Figure 8: The effect of increasing distance from the low water mark on average abundance of Nodilittorina pyramidalis on the rocky shore at Moffat Beach, QLD (4551). Blue bars indicate the average abundance (n=3) and black error bars represent standard error.
Figure 9: The effect of distance from the low water mark on the proportion of Nodilittorina pyramidalis individuals inhabiting harsh (blue) or mild (orange) micro-habitats. Each dot represents the average proportion of individuals inhabiting a particular micro-environment (n=6). Lines represent the linear regression for each micro-environment with associated R2 values (R2 = 0.77 for Harsh and Mild).
Discussion:
The results from this investigation support my hypothesis
that the proportion of individuals utilising milder microhabitats increases as
the distance from the water increases and the proportion of individuals utilising
harsh habitats decreases with distance from the water.
Preference for a certain set of conditions determined by the
species physiology may explain the change in preference as distance from water
increases. McMahon (1990) investigated a new hypothesis in terms of physiology and
vertical distribution in the intertidal zone among many prosbranch snails,
particular those as members in of Littorinidae. He found that Littorinidae
species are highly adapted both behaviourally and physiologically to surviving above
the mean high tide, and this factors greatly on their distribution. Therefore,
these physiological constraints are likely to result in a preference for
particular environmental conditions where they function most effectively (McMahon,
1990).
Pyramid periwinkles are still
reliant on the ocean although they are distributed in the supra-littoral zone
(Chapman, 2000). Therefore, as distance from water increases, the conditions
become less favourable and individuals further from the ocean are likely to
take positions which minimise stress, for instance adhering to shore-ward rock
faces to increase the degree of wetting (Chapman, 2000; McMahon 1990; Judge et al. 2009). Similarly, this species is
highly adapted to surviving in supra-littoral environments, hence survives and
functions less effectively when exposed to excess wetting. Therefore, individuals
closer to the mean high tide are likely to choose more harsh micro-habitats where
the degree of desiccation and heat can counter the excess moisture to minimize
stress and increase physiological efficiency. This pattern of micro-habitat selection
was also observed in Cenchritis muricatus,
a Caribbean Littorinidae of a similar size to N. pyramidalis (Judge et al.,
2009). C. muricatus was found to inhabit
micro-habitats where physiological stress is reduced (Judge et al., 2009), which is also observed in this investigation of N. pyramidalis.
|
|
|
|
Life History and Behaviour |
Reproduction, Growth and Development | |
Reproduction and Life
Cycle
Nodilittorina pyramidalis
is a dioecious species, which means the male and female reproductive organs
occur in separate individuals (Underwood, 1974). Males have short penial filament
with papillae glands, no glandular disc at the base of the penis and have a singular
large malliform gland on the base (Reid and Williams, 2004). The copulatory bursa
in females opens near the end of the pallial oviduct which has two loops in the
egg groove (Reid and Williams, 2004). After copulation, the sperm is nourished
by a nurse cell in the female and transported to the egg where it is internally
fertilised (Borkowski, 1971). Nurse cells are likely to be an adaptation within
the Littorinidae family for living very high in the intertidal (Reid, 1989).
Planktonic
egg capsules are released into the ocean during spawning where they develop
into long-lived planktotrophic veliger larvae which feeds on plankton (Borkowski,
1971; Underwood, 1974). The spawning season is from October to March, it is
beneficial for spawning to occur during this time because phytoplankton blooms
are at their largest, increasing food availability for planktotrophic larvae and
improving the likelihood of survival (Underwood, 1974). Spawning in pyramid periwinkles is reliant on their height
on the shore, the amount of tidal wetting and critical temperatures, resulting in spawning occurring on average every two weeks with the spring tides
(Berry, 1986; Borkowski, 1971). Spawning during spring tides increases dispersal
distance of the larvae and this is beneficial because it increases genetic
diversity and potentially allows for new habitats to be explored (Berry, 1986).
During the spawning season the reproductive organs of both males and females
swell (Underwood, 1974). After March has past, the reproductive organs begin to
decrease in size and eggs that were unfertilised in the females undergo cytolysis (destroying egg cells) and are reabsorbed into the body (Underwood, 1974).
Little is known about the recruitment of juvenile N. pyramidalis back to the high shore,
however since much smaller individuals are often found in crevices lower in the
shore, it is hypothesised that juveniles settle and metamorphose in these rock
crevices and later move higher in the intertidal (Reid and Williams, 2004).
Torsion
Throughout development, all gastropods undergo torsion (Brusca
et al., 2016). Torsion typically takes
place during the veliger larvae stage. Torsion is the rotation of the visceral
mass of the gastropod 180 degrees, resulting in the mantle cavity and anus
moving to near the head (Brusca et al.,
2016). Since Nodilittorina pyramidalis is
a gastropod, it too undergoes torsion, however when it occurs has not been well
studied. The adaptive significance of torsion is not yet agreed upon. One theory
is that the torsion allows for a better retraction of the head into the shell
as protection from predators (Brusca et
al., 2016), however this theory is still unsubstantiated. A further possibility is that torsion and coiling
in the shell evolved in unison to allow for better body alignment within the shell,
more balance and more growth (Brusca et
al., 2016).
|
|
|
Behaviour | |
Body Posturing
Posturing is how an individual snail positions themselves s on the
substrate. Several positions have been observed in Nodilittorina pyramidalis. The positions function to minimize thermal
stress and to prevent desiccation by decreasing contact with the substrate
(Lim, 2008). Decreasing substrate contact minimising the amount of heat that is
transferred to the animal body by conduction and prevents the escape of
moisture (Lim, 2008). A species in the same family, Echinolittorina malaccana, also demonstrate these thermoregulatory
behavioural responses. A study conducted on these species found that these
standing positions significantly reduce the amount of heat entering to body of
the individuals allowing them to remain under the critical thermal limit of the
snail, even more so then being in a shaded environment (Marshall and Chua, 2012).
Three main positions have been identified in N. pyramidalis:
-
Standing: The operculum is closed, and the
snail is held vertically secured by a hold fast.
-
Lifted: The operculum is closed, and the body
is only slightly lifted off the substrate (Figure 10)
-
Hanging: The operculum is closed, and the body is
hanging from the hold fast off a ledge (Figure 11;
Lim, 2008).
These postures require similar behaviours and mechanisms and are generally
responses to similar variables. The individual withdraws into their shell and
seals the operculum opening (Lim, 2008). Dried mucous attached to the substrate
and the tip of the aperture, known as a hold fast, allows them to still stick
to the substratum (Lim, 2008).
Responses
to Unsuitable Habitat
Nodilittorina
pyramidalis behaviourally respond to unsuitable habitat by relocating (Chapman,
1999). In Chapman’s 1999 investigation, N.
pyramidalis individuals demonstrate a strong directional response when they are transplanted lower on shore
than their typical range. The individuals respond by increasing their dispersal
distance and moving up shore (Chapman, 1999). The response is likely to be a
survival mechanism ensuring they have the correct conditions to be functioning most
effectively. This behavioural response may give insight into how individuals of
this species arrive above the high-water mark after settling and
metamorphosing. The juvenile individuals may settle, metamorphose and then
respond behaviourally to the conditions by, like the translocated adults, moving
further up shore.
Aggregations
Figure 12: Intraspecific aggregation of Nodilittorina
pyramidalis in a rocky crack at Moffat Beach,
Queensland (4551).
A. unifasciata is another species from the
family Littorinidae like N. pyramidalis.
It is the other main species inhabiting the supralittoral zone along the east
coast of Australia. Due to differing preferences in substratum as well as
slightly different microhabitat preferences (Chapman, 2000b), these species do not overlap often despite inhabiting the same zone. When
these species do overlap, they usually participate in the same aggregational
behaviour to combat thermal stress (Figure 10; Rojas, et al. 2013).
Figure 13: Interspecific interaction between Austrolittorina
unifasciata (Left) and Nodilittorina pyramidalis (Right) on a
complex substrate at Moffat Beach, Queensland (4551).
|
|
|
|
Anatomy and Physiology |
External Anatomy | |
Shell
Nodilittorina
pyramidalis is a large periwinkle typically ranging shell sizes between a
tiny eight millimetres and approximately three centimetres (Reid and Williams,
2004). The shell is covered in rows of white nodules, however these are not
axially aligned (Figure 15), and which is a distinguishing feature from other
similar looking species. Unlike a similar looking species Echinolittorina trochoides, there is only one row of nodules on the penultimate whorl (Figure 15) and there are two rows of nodules on the final
whorl (Reid and Williams, 2004). The shape of the shell is between a
tall-spired turbinate shape and more conical shell shape and shell shape has
been seen to vary slightly between different beaches (Reid and Willams, 2004).
The shell is also covered in fine cords around the entire surface, however
these cords are not nodulose (Figure 15). The aperture of this species is also is
brown with two cream bands (Reid and Williams, 2004).
Head-foot
The head and sides of the foot of the pyramid perwinkle are grey to
black in colour (Reid and Williams, 2004). The head has two cephalic tentacles
with simple eyes at the base of the tentacles (Figure 16). The cephalic tentacles
have two wide black stripes on the sides of the tentacles, but have a pale tip
(Reid and Williams, 2004). The foot is
muscular and contains mucus producing cells (pedal gland) which secrete mucus
and both are used for movement and adhesion to the substrate (Davies and
Hawkins, 1998). In littorinids, the foot is divided into three main sections:
the propodium, the mesopodium and the metapodium (Reid, 1989). The propodium
and mesopodium are near the head region on the foot and are separated by a deep
transverse groove (Reid, 1989). The metapodium is at the posterior end of the
body and bears the operculum. The foot in most littorinids has a longitudinal
division which allows for locomotion using two series of waves (ditaxic
locomotion) (Reid, 1989). This form of movement allows for better turning and
adhesion to the substrate and is hence thought be evolutionarily beneficial for
highshore species such as N. pyramidalis (Reid,
1989).
Operculum
The operculum is the structure which closes and seals the
aperture (Reid, 1989). In high shore littorinids, it is common for the
operculum to be thick with more spiral to decrease water loss. In Nodilittorina pyramidalis, the operculum
is brown and spiralled however is not as thick as other littorinids (Reid,
1989). However, the circular shape helps to decrease water loss.
Mantle
The mantle in all gastropods is very important since it is
the outer layer of the body and secretes the gastropod shell. It is a sheet
like organ that envelops the molluscan body (Brusca, et al., 2016). This organ creates the mantle cavity which houses
the ctenidium, osphariadia, nephridiopores, gonopores and anus (Brusca, et al., 2016).
Mouth and Radula
The pyramid periwinkle is an herbivorous gastropod, feeding
on microalgae in the high intertidal zone, and as such have a specialised mouth
and radula (Reid, 1989). The mouth is a structure on the head between the
cephalic tentacles that faces downwards towards the substrate. The radula
protrudes through the mouth and collects microalgae from the substrate and
brings it back into the mouth.
The radula in littorinids tends to be long because it can become degraded relatively quickly
from feeding on microalgae on hard substrates and therefore also has many tooth
rows (Reid, 1989). There are four main types of tooth on the littorinid radula:
rachidian, lateral tooth, inner marginal tooth and the outer marginal tooth. In
rock dwelling species such as the pyramid periwinkle, there are typically three
or less cusps on the rachidian, lateral tooth and inner marginal tooth, which
is a potentially a function of feeding on hard substrates (Reid, 1989). The
rachidian in N. pyramidalis has only
one major elongated cusp (Reid and Williams, 2004). The lateral and inner
marginal tooth have to main cusps and are large and blunter at the tip (Reid
and Williams, 2004) In Nodilittorina, the outer marginal tooth
has a distinct shape, where there is a narrow neck before broadening into a
cusp bearing head with six or seven elongated and pointed cusps (Reid, 1989;
Reid and Williams, 2004).
|
|
|
Internal Systems | |
Circulatory and Respiratory
In most molluscs, the main body cavity is a hemocoel where tissues
are bathed in hemolymph (blood) (Brusca et
al. 2016). The hemolymph has many different cell types and its main functions
is to transport oxygen and nutrients around the body. The heart in littorinids is
in the pericardinal chamber and has only one atria and one ventricle (Mill, 1972).
Oxygenated hemolymph is transported from the branchial vessel near the
ctenidium into the atrium which then pump the hemolymph into the ventricle
(Brusca, et al, 2016). The ventricle
then pumps the oxygenated hemolymph through the main artery into the sinus and
haemocoel area, bathing the tissues in hemolymph. The de-oxygenated blood is then
funnelled back to the branchial vessels to become oxygenated again (Brusca, et al., 2016).
Littorinids have lost the right ctenidium and the left ctenidium is attached
directly to the mantle (Mill, 1972). The gill filaments extend into the mantle
cavity (known as the monopectinate condition). As water enters the mantle
cavity from the left, cilia on the ctenidia move water over the ctenidia (Brusca, et al. 2016). The
hemolymph flows in the vessels in the opposite direction (Brusca, et al., 2016). This allows for counter-current
exchange of oxygen, which is very effective as maximal oxygen can always be diffusing
across into the haemolymph. The water depleted in oxygen then exits on the
right side of the head near the opening of the anus and nephridiopore (Brusca, et al., 2016).
Nervous and Sensory
General
The most common nervous system in the family Littorinidae is
one with an epiathroid structure (Reid, 1989). In epiathroid neural structures,
the cerebral and pleural ganglia are adjacent (Reid, 1989). Peripheral nerves stem
from the cerebral ganglia to other sense organs and the buccal ganglia which
control buccal musculature, the radula and the oesophagus, which further innervates
other organs in the mantle cavity (Brusca, et
al., 2016). Visceral cords stem from the pleural ganglia which continue to
the posterior of the animal. From these visceral cords, peripheral nerves stem
to the mantle and visceral mass (Brusca, et
al., 2016). However, due to torsion, the gastropod nervous system is twisted
into a figure eight and the posterior nerves are now localised near the head and
have been shortened (Brusca, et al.,
2016). Nerves are also present in the foot, allowing for locomotory movement (Brusca,
et al., 2016). Some important sense
organs include the eye, the cephalic tentacles and osphradia.
The Eye
The eye is a prominent and obvious sensory structure of Nodilittorina pyramidalis due to its dark
pigmentation. The eye is located at the base of the cephalic tentacle and is
visible through the transparent skin overlaying it (Newell, 1963). The eye in
littorinids receives light from both in front and above it based on its structure
(Newell, 1963). The main components of the littorinid eye include the lens, cornea
(and associated muscle), pigment layer and the optic nerves (Newell, 1963; Brusca,
et al., 2016). In Newell’s 1963
investigation of the eye of Littorina
littorea eye, he found that the eye should produce sharp images of distant
object in the air and underwater that view would only be slightly distorted. This
would be useful in littorinid species, particularly the pyramid periwinkle since
it spends most of its time above the water.
The Cephalic Tentacle
The cephalic tentacles are tentacles that are localised on
the head. Species in the family Littorinidae only have one pair of cephalic
tentacles and no other tentacles (Ng, et
al., 2013). The cephalic tentacles are long, mobile and are not covered in cilia
(Reid, 1989). In Ng, et al.’s investigation
(2013), the cephalic tentacles of littorinids were seen to frequently contact
the substrate during trail following, likely with tactile and chemosensors. Therefore,
it has been hypothesised the tentacles are an important component of sensory trail
following and may be particularly important in forming aggregations which prevent
aggregations (Ng, et al., 2013).
Osphradia
Osphradia are chemoreceptors located near the ctenidium which
sometimes assist with ventilation (Brusca, et
al., 2016). In Littorinidae, the
osphraidum occurs on the ctenidia and has many nerves and is highly ciliated
outside the sensory zone (Haszprunar, 1985). In high-shore species such as the
pyramid periwinkle, the ctenidium are reduced but the osphradia is still well
developed (Haszprunar, 1985). More about the osphradia is yet to be understood particularly
because it varies greatly within taxonomic groups (Brusca, et al., 2016).
Digestive System
All gastropods have complete guts and digestion takes place
extracellularly including in Nodilittorina
pyramidalis. Microalgae is scraped up into the mouth by the radula which is
stored in the buccal cavity. There are several glands secreting into this
buccal region to ensure a smooth functioning radula as well several glands secreting
enzymes (Brusca, et al., 2016). Food
passes down through the oesophagus into the gizzard which is a highly muscular
stomach and grinds tough vegetable matter. The enzymes secreted in the foregut,
stomach and in the digestive gland cells accomplish extracellular digestion (Brusca,
et al., 2016). Intracellular
digestion occurs after the food matter has passed through the stomach into the
digestive gland cells and in the walls of the intestine (Brusca, et al., 2016). Waste passes through the intestine
and expelled through the anus near the head of the animal.
Excretory System
In littorinids, the heart is where primary urine is produced,
and this is transported from the pericardinal sac to the nephridium (Emson, et al., 2002). The nephridium is large
in littorinids and is the site of selection reabsorption of organic solutes (Emson,
et al., 2002; Brusca, et al., 2016). The fluid then passes out
through the nephridiopores, typically near the anus (Emson, et al., 2002; Brusca, et al., 2016). The structure of excretory
system is quite variable within Littorinidae,
however highshore species typically have adaptations to decrease the production
of primary urine, most likely to survive the harsh environment (Emson, et al., 2002).
|
|
|
|
Biogeographic Distribution | |
Species in the family Littorinidae are very widespread throughout both temperate and tropical environments (Reid and Williams, 2004). Nodilittorina is a genus in this family which previously contained more members, however many species have since been moved to different clades and N. pyramidalis is currently the only species in this clade. N. pyramidalis is endemic to Australia and inhabits rocky shores from Victoria to Southern Queensland including Norfolk Island and Lord Howe Island (Reid and Williams, 2004).
|
|
|
Evolution and Systematics | |
Nodilittorina
pyramidalis falls into Mollusca, a major phylum in the Animal Kingdom.
Mollusca is broken up into several major classes including: Monoplacophora,
Polyplacophora, Gastropoda, Bivalvia, Scaphopoda and Cephalopoda (Brusca, et al., 2016). N. pyramidalis falls into the Gastropoda class which contains all
snails, limpets and slugs. Littorinomorpha is an order within Gastropoda which
is largely unsettled but includes some marine grazing snails including
periwinkles (Brusca, et al., 2016). Within Littorinomorpha, the pyramid periwinkle
falls within the family Littorinidae includes all of the periwinkle snails (littorinids)
and the taxonomy is still under dispute (Brusca, et al., 2016).
Nodilittorina
is a genus within Littorinidae and about a
decade ago the genus had approximately fifty species within it based mainly on
physical features such as the shell morphology, structure of the penes and morphology
of the eggs (Reid, 2002). Prior to this, Nodilittorina
was treated as a subgenus to Littorina
(Reid, 2002; Reid and Williams, 2004). The
genus mainly consisted of species abundant on rocky shores from the foreshore and
littoral fringe throughout the tropics and the southern temperate region. However,
after conducting some molecular analyses, Nodilittorina
no longer appeared to be a monophyletic group (Reid, 2002; Reid and Williams,
2004). Molecular analyses of Nodilittorina
found that it should rather than being one large clade, it should be 4
smaller genus’: Austrolittorina,
Afrolittorina, Echinolittorina and Nodilittorina
which also appear to have biogeographic relationships within the clades
(Reid and Williams, 2004). Nodilittorina is a monotypic genus, meaning
it contains only one species, N.
pyramidalis. The analysis provided no real support to include the pyramid
periwinkle within a different genus, so it remains as the lone representative
for Nodilittorina (Reid and Williams,
2004).
Table 1: Scientific Classification of Nodilittorina pyramidalis
|
|
|
Conservation and Threats | |
Nodilittorina
pyramidalis is not a species which is in urgent need of targeted conservation
efforts. The pyramid periwinkle is abundant on rocky shores of the Australian east
coast and although it is a species endemic to Australia, it is not under
immediate threat of disappearing (Benkendorff and Przeslawski, 2008).
N.
pyramidalis inhabits the area above the mean high tide and Chapman (2000)
found that species in these environments are able to respond rapidly to the
variable conditions. Along with this, the pyramid periwinkle has many strategies
for coping with thermal stress and desiccation stress such as body posturing as
well as generally having a much higher thermal tolerance (McMahon, 1990). The
ability of this species to rapidly respond to climate as well as their ability
to withstand high thermal and desiccation stress shows this species is
potentially well equipped for withstanding environmental changes. N. pyramidalis larvae also has the
potential capability for long distance dispersal due to its long lived
planktotrophic larvae (Borkowski, 1971; Underwood, 1974). The long dispersal of
this species gives it the potential for exploiting new habitats, allowing it to
shift it’s distribution in the face of changing conditions if necessary.
However, the endemism of this species
may be cause for concern in the future, particularly as we still do not yet understand
its distribution patterns fully. As the temperature along the Australian east
coast increases, there species range of this species may potentially constrict
southwards because the species current thermal and desiccation strategies may not
be adequate to tolerate the changing conditions (O’hara, 2002; Chen et al., 2011). Should the climate continue
to warm in this way, there is a high likelihood that many temperate intertidal invertebrates
which are endemic to Australia will no longer be able to shift their distribution
southwards and potentially become extinct (O’hara, 2002; Chen et al., 2011). The pyramid periwinkle
also has particular habitat preferences of rocky shores with complex substrates.
This may limit their ability to disperse and exploit new habitats if no suitable
habitats are within range for the species. Distribution patterns, both locally
and on a large scale are still not well understood for this species (Chapman
and Underwood, 1994). Therefore, with the changing climate, there is potential
for change in an unknown variable which may limit their distribution. Understanding
of the distribution of endemic species is necessary to predict the outcomes of
climate change for these species and for future conservation purposes. Therefore,
there is the potential for this species to become rare in the future, however
due to its current abundance, it is not an immediate conservation issue.
|
|
|
References | |
Berry, A. J. 1986. ‘Semi-lunar
and lunar spawing periodicity in some tropical littorinid gastropods’, Journal of Molluscan Studies, vol. 52,
pp. 144-149.
Bekendorff, K. and Przeslawski,
R. 2008. ‘Multiple measures are necessary to assess rarity in macro-molluscs: a
case study from southeastern Australia’, Biodiversity
and Conservation vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 2455-2478.
Borkowski, T. V. 1971. ‘Reproduction
and reproductive periodicities of South Floridian Littorinidae (Gastropoda; Prosobranchia)’,
Bulletin of Marine Science, vol. 21,
no. 4, pp. 826-840.
Brusca, R. C., Moore, W. and Shuster, S. M. 2016. Invertebrates, 3rd edn,
Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland.
Chapman, M. G. 2000a. ‘Variability of foraging in highshore
habitats: dealing with unpredictability’, Hydrobiologia,
vol. 426, pp. 75 – 87.
Chapman, M. G. 2000b. ‘A comparative study of differences
among species and patches of habitat on movements of three species of intertidal
gastropods’, Journal of Experimental
Marine Biology and Ecology, vol. 244, pp. 181-201.
Chapman, M. G. and Underwood, A. J. 1994. ‘Dispersal of the
intertidal snail, Nodilittorina pyramidalis,
in response to the topographic complexity of the substratum’, Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and
Ecology, vol. 179, pp. 145-169.
Chen, I. C., Hill, J. K., Ohlemuller, R., Roy, D. B. and Thomas,
C. D. 2011. ‘Rapid Range Shifts of Species Associated with High Levels of
Climate Warming’, Science, vol. 333,
no. 6045, pp. 1024-1026.
Davies, M. S. and Hawkins, S. J. 1998. ‘Mucus from Marine
Molluscs’, Advances in Marine Biology,
vol. 34, pp. 1-71.
Emson, R. H., Morritt, D., Andrews, E. B. and Young, C. M.
2002, ‘Life on a hot dry beach: behavioural, physiological, and ultrastructural
adaptations of the littorinid gastropod Cenchritis (Tectarius) muricatus’, Marine Biology, vol. 140, pp. 723-732.
Haszprunar, G 1985, ‘The fine morphology of the osphradial
sense organs of the Mollusca. I. Gastropoda, Prosobranchia’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal
Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, vol. 307, pp. 457-496.
Lim, S. S. 2008. ‘Body posturing in Nodilittorina pyramidalis and Austrolittorina
unifasciata (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Littorinidae): a behavioural response to
reduce heat stress’, Nature, vol. 54,
no. 1, pp. 339-347.
Little, C. 1989. ‘Factors governing patterns of foraging
activity in littoral marine herbivorous molluscs’, The Malacological Society of London, vol. 55, pp. 273-284.
McMahon, R. F. 1990. ‘Thermal tolerance, evaporative water
loss, air-water oxygen consumption and zonation of intertidal prosobranchs: a
new synthesis’, Hydrobiologia, vol.
193, pp. 241-260.
Mill, P. J. 1972. ‘Lungs and Respiratory Trees’, In:
Respiration in the Invertebrates. Macmillan Studies in Comparative Zoology.
Palgrave, London.
Newell, G. E 1963, ‘The eye of Littorina littorea’, Proceedings
of the Zoological Society of London, vol. 144, pp. 75-86.
Ng, T. P. T., Saltin, S. H., Davies, M. S., Johannesson, K.,
Stafford, R. and Williams, G. A. 2013, ‘Snails and their trails: the multiple
functions of trail-following in gastropods’, Biological Reviews, vol. 88, pp.
683-700.
O’hara, T. D. 2002. ‘Endemism, rarity and vulnerability of marine
species along a temperate coastline’, Invertebrate
Systematics, vol. 16, pp. 671-684.
Reid, D. G 1989, ‘The comparative morphology, phylogeny and
evolution of the Gastropod Family Littorinidae’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B,
Biological Sciences, vol. 324, no. 1220, pp. 1-110.
Reid, D. G. 2002. ‘Morphological review and phylogenetic
analysis of Nodilittorina (Gastropoda:
Littorinidae)’, Journal of Molluscan
Studies, vol. 68, pp. 259-281.
Reid, D. G. and Williams, S. T. 2004. ‘The Subfamily
Littorininae (Gastropoda: Littorinidae) in the Temperate Southern Hemisphere: The
Genera Nodilittorina, Austrolittorina
and Afrolittorina’, Records of the Australian Museum, vol.
56, pp. 76-120.
Underwood, A. J. 1974. ‘The Reproductive Cycles and Geographical
Distribution of Some Common Eastern Australian Prosobranchs (Molluscs :
Gastropoda)’, Australiam Journal of Marine
and Freshwater Research, vol. 25, pp. 63-88.
|
|
|
|
|